Two motions, in sequence. A short diagnostic that establishes the question. A ninety-day engagement that answers it under real conditions.
The diagnostic phase runs three to four weeks. We work with executive sponsors, functional leaders, and the people doing the work to map where AI is most likely to move a number that matters. We look at the operating model, the data, the existing pipeline of pilots, and the political weather around them.
The output is a portfolio document — a small set of opportunities, each with an honest read of the value at stake, the technical viability, the operating cost, and the evidence the firm would need to commit. From that portfolio, we recommend one candidate for proof-of-value.
The proof-of-value engagement runs ninety days against the candidate decision. A small joint team — Orven and client — designs the system, builds the production- adjacent version, and instruments the lift. We work in two-week cycles with a standing review at the executive sponsor level.
By the end of the engagement, leadership has a quantified read of the lift, the failure modes, the workflow change required of the people involved, and the all-in cost of operating the system at steady state. The decision to scale, defer, or kill is made on evidence — not on slides.
Clients can expect a weekly working session, a fortnightly executive review, and a standing artifact log. We bring proprietary methodology assets — frameworks for opportunity scoring, decision-quality review, and operating-cost modeling — that remain available to the client team after the engagement closes.
Our engagements are senior-led. The people in the room are the people doing the work. We do not staff with junior delivery.